09 Oct: EoP Response to Nigel Farage: Donald Trump’s ‘grab them by the pussy’ is ‘alpha male boasting’. CC: GOP Donald Trump; Democrats: Hillary Clinton.

sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34

Files: EoP Axis / EoP Applicants / Timothy McVeigh / Vladimir Putin / EoP Wealth Transfer

09 Oct 2016: EoP Response to Nigel Farage: Donald Trump’s ‘grab them by the pussy’ is ‘alpha male boasting’

sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34Correction Edits:
Added: “Donald Trump and” to paragraph: “If you know what you mean by ‘real issues’; my interpretation of your – and your party and other United Kingdom political parties, left and right — actions indicate that – like Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton – you don’t give a flying fuck about addressing the root causes of the ‘real issues’ you and your voters endlessly whine about like squeeling piglets stuck in a Halal abbatoir.”

Replaced confusing (i)(ii) with (a)(b) in paragraph: “I do what I can to support EoP Applicants, FSB, NSA individuals; to the extent that my working hypothesis conclusion interpretation of their actions and/or messages is that they (a) are attempting to determine whether it’s possible to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; preferably honourably, transparently with military, political, religious and media elite and citizens fully informed consent; or if that’s not possible; (i) whether there is enough military and legal support for minimum amount of force orderly and legal coercive implementation; and if not so: (ii) whether there is enough military and police support for military shock and awe ‘grab them by the pussy/nuts’: wake the fuck up you goddamn cockroaches; we are goddamn serious’ measures to change Masonic War is Peace military, political, religious and media elite and citizens minds to support of aforementioned fully informed consent or minimum orderly and coercive force measures to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; (b) shall reciprocate my support in helping them with their enquiry; by helping me to get what I want.”

sqs-bg_gg-m_300x17

_____________________________________
From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 10:50 PM
Subject: EoP Response to Nigel Farage: Donald Trump’s ‘grab them by the pussy’ is ‘alpha male boasting’
To: Nigel Farage <nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu>, UKIP <mail@ukip.org>
Cc: Donald Trump 2016 <info@donaldtrump.com>, “Donald J. Trump” <Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com>, “Counsel: Donald F McGahn” <dmcgahn@jonesday.com>, Jeffrey Lord <jlpa1@aol.com>, Adam Tebrugge<adam@tebruggelegal.com>, Jeffrey Goldman <jeff@jgoldmanlaw.com>, Roger Stone <stone@stonezone.com>,Trump Backers <info@trumpbackers.com>, Our Principles PAC <info@ourprinciplespac.com>, Make America Great Again PAC <info@makeamericagreatagainpac.com>, The Trump Report <editor@thetrumpreport.com>, “Infowars: Alex Jones via Katherine” <Katharine@infowars.com>, Diamond & Silk <DiamondandSilk@gmail.com>, Hillary Clinton via Nathaniel Koloc <nkoloc@hillaryclinton.com>, Rebecca Keate <rkeate@hillaryclinton.com>, N Budzinski <nbudzinski@hillaryclinton.com>, Lindsay Lassman <llassman@hillaryclinton.com>, Jen Berg <jberg@hillaryclinton.com>, Priyanka Mantha <pmantha@hillaryclinton.com>, Press <press@hillaryclinton.com>,Timothy McVeigh <truthseeker2436577@yahoo.com>, President Vladimir Putin via Kremlin Press Office<press_office@prpress.gov.ru>

TO: UKIP: Nigel Farage
CC: Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton

UKIP: Nigel Farage:
Nigel Farage (nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu); Breaking Point: UKIP (mail@ukip.org);

Donald Trump:
Donald Trump 2016 (info@donaldtrump.com); Donald Trump: Donald J. Trump(Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com); Counsel: Donald F McGahn (dmcgahn@jonesday.com); Donald Trump 2016 (dmcgahn@jonesday.com); Jeffrey Lord (jlpa1@aol.com); Adam Tebrugge (adam@tebruggelegal.com); Jeffrey Goldman (jeff@jgoldmanlaw.com); Roger Stone (stone@stonezone.com); Trump Backers (info@trumpbackers.com); Our Principles PAC(info@ourprinciplespac.com); The Trump Report (editor@thetrumpreport.com); Make America Great Again PAC (info@makeamericagreatagainpac.com); Infowars: Alex Jones via Katherine(Katharine@infowars.com); Diamond & Silk (DiamondandSilk@gmail.com)

Hillary Clinton:
Hillary Clinton via Nathaniel Koloc (nkoloc@hillaryclinton.com); Rebecca Keate (rkeate@hillaryclinton.com); N Budzinski (nbudzinski@hillaryclinton.com); Lindsay Lassman (llassman@hillaryclinton.com); Jen Berg (jberg@hillaryclinton.com); Priyanka Mantha (pmantha@hillaryclinton.com); Press (press@hillaryclinton.com)

EoP Applicants:
Timothy McVeigh (truthseeker2436577@yahoo.com); President Vladimir Putin via Kremlin Press Office (press_office@prpress.gov.ru)

Mr. Farage:

EoP Response to Nigel Farage: Donald Trump’s ‘grab them by the pussy’ is ‘alpha male boasting’

Ecology of Peace culture feedback regarding your statement to SkyNews about media disclosures about Donald Trump’s ‘grab them by the pussy’ remarks: “This is alpha male boasting. Its the kind of thing, if were being honest, that men do. They sit around and have a drink and they talk like this and by the way quite a lot of women say things amongst themselves that they would not want to see on Fox News or the front page of newspapers. I’m not pretending its good, its ugly. It is ugly. There are going to be Republican candidates running for the hills, disowning him. This is what happens in politics. People look after their own interests ahead of the collective good of the party. Look its not good, but I’ll tell you what there’s a whole host of stories coming out about Hillary, not to mention Bill, when we talk about sexual impropriety. If I were Trump going into this tomorrow; I would say “Hands Up…  I behaved in a very alpha male boorish way. I apologize, but hey lets talk about the real issues.”

Re: If we are being honestRe: Alpha Male Boasting:

If I am accurately interpreting you: Donald Trump’s ‘grab them by the pussy’ etc behaviour is considered by some to be approved or condoned ‘alpha male’ behaviour.

I am not an alpha male; nor do I pretend to be; and I am no expert on what men who call themselves alpha males; or who pretend to be alpha males do to impress each other.

In fact; according to my reading and interpretation of Robert Ardrey’s opinions and research on alpha males; as described in his book: The Social Contract: A Personal Inquiry into the Evolutionary Sources of Order and Disorder; there is no absolute clear concrete definition of what exactly an alpha male is; that is relevant and applicable to all species and/or human culture’s. Put differently, different animals and species have different meanings and behavioural traits for what they consider ‘alpha male’ behaviour.

Aside from one species, the hamadryas, the structure of the baboon troop has a central group of alpha males who not only defend the whole troop but keep order within it. Washburn and De Vore concluded that the capacity to get along with one’s fellows must be a necessity in the alpha male. We deal here not with as mild a creature as the samango or colobus monkeys, but with the most belligerent citizen in the non-human primate world. That alphaness must include the capacity to suppress rugged individualism bears notice. Yet the three or four males of the central group prefer one another’s company, act always in concert, never quarrel, and accept any challenge to one as a challenge to all. Were a male however strong, however intelligent, however ambitious, unable to accept these essentially political conditions of existence, he could not be an alpha baboon.

The following year, in 1962, Stuart Altmann became the first observer to draw attention to the capacity for coalition in the rhesus monkey. Among rhesus males, however, such coalitions are not between equals. The steps of rank are distinct, and alpha is an individual who must somehow maintain his rank quite on his own, though he leads a group of animals only slightly less aggressive than baboons. In this situation true political shenanigans have value. Alpha, pressed by beta, will make a temporary alliance with gamma. Or gamma, with designs on beta, will ingratiate himself with alpha. Since greatest conflict comes between adjoining ranks, such temporary alliances may take place at any social level. When Thomas Struhsaker recently published his elegant series of studies of vervet-monkey troops in Kenya’s Amboseli, he found that 20 percent of all contacts between males involved temporary coalitions.

From broad enough inspection of animal examples, we can gain some appreciation for the qualities of the alpha fish, but no organizing principles. We may say that dominance occurs. And rank in the social order becomes one of Wynne-Edwards’ conventional prizes pursued by conventional means. We may look at armies and governments, political or religious movements, corporation personnel or academic faculties, and we shall find the same invariable structure of rank, the same motivation from below to above, the same command by alphas as in primate troops or elephant herds. In the organization of any society of unequal beings to act as one, evolution has favored the mechanism of hierarchy. But despite his universal appearance in social orders, despite the varied testimony we have gathered concerning the nature of the beast, we still do not know what an alpha fish is.

We have been inspecting hierarchy from the top down. We have been viewing the alpha as an individual phenomenon. But the dominating cannot exist without the dominated, the leader without followers. Perhaps if we reverse our standpoint we shall penetrate the mystery more deeply. If we take a fish- eye view of the hull of the passing ship, then who knows? Perhaps we shall glimpse the captain.

I know what my values are and what impresses me about others: sincerity, honesty, character, root cause problem solving. I don’t care if they are an alpha or pretend to be an alpha male or female; or what their physical appearance is.

According to my personal working hypothesis conception of an ‘alpha male’; I somehow cannot imagine alpha male Vladimir Putin saying or doing something like Donald Trump said to a random woman whom he may find attractive. Maybe when he was a thirteen year old thug, before he decided to leave thug life and; he may have said and done such things; but certainly not beyond the age of 18. He clearly has no fear whatsoever of making brutally clear statements; that many may find offensive; and seeing them published on the front page of the worlds newspapers. I imagine he does not engage in such ‘alpha male’ behaviour; cause its not what he considers ‘alpha male’ behaviour; and chasing around the planet with his dick in his hand, to engage in fake relating with tits and ass sluts; is not conducive to his existential goals.

That is not to say that alpha male Putin has not and not brutally and if necessary coercively assert his alpha male authority to a man or woman; in extremely harsh terms; if or when he consideres such verbal or physical brutal coercive actions to be necessary for the protection of the group or the groups values.

However engaging in such brutal less than informed consent behaviour for nothing more than the personal satisfaction of his own penis and fragile ego; is not the behaviour of a competent adult alpha male; who has a sincere concern for the group of individuals whom consider him to be their alpha male.

Maybe if Vladimir Putin’s life’s goals were fucking every tits and ass slut he remotely found attractive; he may have decided to devote his life to impressing his thug friends with how he would go up to random allegedly attractive women and grab them by the pussy; or refer to them as bleeding out of their vagina’s; when they hurt his fragile ego feelings.

However that is not, and does not appear to have been Vladimir Putin’s existential purpose. His life’s existential purpose – as far as I can tell – has been related to his concern for his country and its people: Russia; to regain some sort of stature for his country within international relations; and subsequent thereto to use such power and influence for the benefit of all; not simply Russians.

If the British Empire and/or the subsequent American Empire had given a fuck about using their power and influence for the benefit of all; by supporting the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; then maybe Vladimir Putin may have chosen to devote his life to being a delinquent thug and running around the planet with his dick in his hand, to engage in relating with tits and ass sluts; although I doubt it.

I don’t imagine an alpha male Japanese samurai warrior saying or doing something like Donald Trump said to a random woman whom he may find attractive.

So I guess if we were being honest; we would say ‘Donald Trump was engaged in what one or more, but most certainly not all cultures on earth; consider alpha male boasting.’

Re: If we are being honestRe: Alpha Male Boasting worthy of condemnation?:

I am not a member of Donald Trump’s culture. If the individuals who consider themselves a member of Donald Trump’s culture consider such behaviour to be condoned behaviour for their alpha male protectors; then it’s really not much of my business.

If Mr. Trump wants to engage in such non-consensual pussy grabbing behaviour with members of the Ecology of Peace culture; the steel justice bridge Ecology of Peace culture penalty for refusing to abide by informed consent principles will be in accordance to Deception Communication Crimes of Aggression; as clarified further below.

If Mr Donald Trump is confused about the meaning of informed consent; herewith an example of what he could say: I notice I am having thoughts about wanting to grab your pussy/penis. If that offends you I am sorry. If you are willing to discuss it; could you let me know so that we can discuss whether I can grab your pussy/penis; and what I mean by ‘grab’ and what I mean by ‘pussy/penis’. The woman or man could then say ‘No thanks’ or ‘Yes I am willing to discuss it; and such conversation could ensue; and the entire matter whether any pussy/penis grabbing occurred, and if so, hopefully in private; or not; would be a matter of informed consent between adults.

Re: If we are being honest: Advice for Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton:

I don’t know what Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton want. I don’t know what anyone in Donald Trump’s Republican Party or Hillary Clinton’s Democratic Party or any of their voters want.

In my culture if you sincerely want to help someone; you must first make buck stops here sure that you know exactly what they want.

If they are buck stops here clear about what they want; and you are capable of helping them get it; if you are willing to help them tell them, agree and inform them of what you charge in order to help them; or disagree and don’t waste their time.

If you are incapable of helping them get what they want; don’t pretend that you are capable of helping them get what they want. Tell them that you do not have the skills or authority to help them get what they want.

If you are buck stops here sincerely unsure about whether you can help them, inform them; and engage each other on a collective cooperative measure to get what they want.

If they are not buck stops here clear about what they want; then it is not possible to help them to get what they want. All you can do is to help them clarify for themselves what they want.

EoP Acting Clerk’s preferences:

The NSA, FSB, EoP Applicants, United States Government: former and current US Navy Judge Advocate Generals; Former and Current President Bush and Obama, Former and current Attorney Generals: John Aschroft, Eric Holder & Loretta Lynch have repeatedly been informed over the past 15 years, and consequently do currently know; what I want: clarification from Timothy McVeigh and/or the United States Government whether Timothy McVeigh’s faked execution pardon allows for us to spend a few years alone off grid somewhere in the Siberian wilderness before we depart the planet together. If McVeigh’s pardon does not make for such allowances; and/or there continues to be fuck all buck stops here response from Timothy McVeigh and/or the United States Government; I am and have been making preparations – see: correspondence to Magistrate Essel — to depart on my own; preferably to Siberian wilderness in Russia; and if not possible: via assisted suicide at Dignitas in Switzerland.

EoP Applicants; FSB: Gen Bortnikov, NSA: Adm Rogers – and other FSB and NSA officials, numbers and names unknown – preferences:

I do what I can to support EoP Applicants, FSB, NSA individuals; to the extent that my working hypothesis conclusion interpretation of their actions and/or messages is that they (a) are attempting to determine whether it’s possible to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; preferably honourably, transparently with military, political, religious and media elite and citizens fully informed consent; or if that’s not possible; (i) whether there is enough military and legal support for minimum amount of force orderly and legal coercive implementation; and if not so: (ii) whether there is enough military and police support for military shock and awe ‘grab them by the pussy/nuts’: wake the fuck up you goddamn cockroaches; we are goddamn serious’ measures to change Masonic War is Peace military, political, religious and media elite and citizens minds to support of aforementioned fully informed consent or minimum orderly and coercive force measures to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; (b) shall reciprocate my support in helping them with their enquiry; by helping me to get what I want.

Re: If we are being honest: Real issues:

I am not a member of your culture; so I don’t know what you mean by ‘real issues’.

If you know what you mean by ‘real issues’; my interpretation of your – and your party and other United Kingdom political parties, left and right — actions indicate that – like Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton – you don’t give a flying fuck about addressing the root causes of the ‘real issues’ you and your voters endlessly whine about like squeeling piglets stuck in a Halal abbatoir.

Real Issues for Ecology of Peace culture:

  1. Buck stops here honourable factual communication. If you are not engaged in a buck stops here discussion; no matter how uncomfortable that makes your fuck honour ego; you are engaged in fragile ego attention seeking.
  2. If your buck stops here honourable factual communication is about helping someone to solve something they refer to as a ‘problem’; and you have fuck all interest in helping them to get to the root causes of their ‘problem’ you ain’t got any goddamn fucking sincere interest in helping them.
  3. A summary of the Ecology of Peace culture’s Ecology of Peace Reality Facts analysis of the root cause of most of what fuck honour religious political and corporate politicians and their fuck honour civilian citizens call ‘problems’: whether: slavery, oppression, climate change; food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racism, feminism, nazism, Islamism, capitalism, communism, militarization of police, etc:

Ecology of Peace Reality Facts: 1.   Earth is not flat. 2.      Resources are finite. 3.      When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict. 4.      The root policy cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits are the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract’. 5.      If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, and/or nations want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.

Here follows Ecology of Peace culture Wealth Transfer Options as excerpted from and updated at: EoP Wealth Transfer Option; which include Ecology of Peace Honourable Reason and Logic Problem Solving Communication Policy Values as excerpted and updated at: EoP RH culture info.

EoP Wealth Transfer Options to shut down Casino Ponzi Economy:

EoP Axis Nationalization of Individuals Property:

All individuals owning property greater than the EoP allotted ecofootprint ration – as detailed under: Ecology of Peace New Economy Sustainability Definition paragraphs – will have their property nationalized.

An EoP allotted ecofootprint ration of nationalized property shall be provided to any citizen who has no property; who has signed a Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration; for their use; to enable them to sustain their most basic shelter, food and water needs; and engage with neighbours into local food production cooperatives; to begin the process of rebuilding local cooperative tribal responsible freedom communities.

EoP Axis Nationalization of Banks & Corporations:

All Banks from Bank of International Settlements; Inter-American Development Bank; APRACA: Asia-Pacific Rural to the Agriculture Credit Association; to traded and privately owned corporations shall be nationalized. The Derivatives Market will go through bankruptcy proceedings and both the Derivatives Market and Stock Exchanges will be shut down.

The ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace social contract shall be removed and replaced with Ecology of Peace clauses that restrict all the worlds citizens of all races, religions and classes to procreating and consuming below ecological carrying capacity limits; relating with others in accordance to fully informed consenting agreements; and violaters shall be eliminated from the planetary genepool. For more info on transforming the planetary economy to a sustainable economy: see: Community Solution: Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil; Doug Tompkins: The Next Economy: Transitions from Globalization to Eco-Localization.

The EoP Economy shall be based upon already mined gold and ultimately a resource mix based currency standard; where all lending / borrowing and/or bartering is to be limited to consumption and production of non-renewable and renewable natural resources below Ecological Carrying Capacity limits.

Banks and/or Corporations may avoid coercive nationalization by voluntarily choosing to engage in the conversion of their corporations to EoP cooperative corporations; by giving employees the opportunity to vote whether they wish to (a) remain with the corporation and convert their former corporation to be managed in accordance to cooperative ownership principles and agree to sign anEcology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration; (b) leave the corporation in accordance with with six months salary retrenchment package.

All nationalized corporations shall undergo the same employee vote process. Only individuals who have signed Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declarationmay be considered for Cooperative Management positions.

All Corporate Pensions for all employees who have not yet retired; whether they sign Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration, vote to remain with the corporation or be retrenched; are immediately cancelled. All Corporate Pensions for individuals who have already retired shall be notified that such pensions shall be cancelled within twelve months.

All corporate employees, including current or former pension holders; who do not own any property; who sign an Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declarationshall be provided with an EoP allotted ecofootprint ration of nationalized property; for their use; to enable them to sustain their most basic shelter, food and water needs; and engage with neighbours into local food production cooperatives; to begin the process of rebuilding local cooperative tribal responsible freedom communities.

Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Energy Facilities:

All IAEA: International Atomic Energy Agency member states are to immediately draw up a report detailing how they commit to the decommission of all their Nuclear Weapons and Energy facilities; within five years.

World Coal Association: All member corporations are to immediately draw up a report detailing how they intend to support the orderly termination and closure of all coal mining and energy production with a Production Footprint above ecological renewable/non renewable carrying capacity limits; i.e. all future coal exploitation and production of non-renewable and renewable natural resources must be limited to below Ecological Carrying Capacity limits.

Breeding & Consumption Crimes of Aggression:

“Any individual who is found guilty of advocating on behalf of, legislating, enforcing, or obeying any – cultural, religious, common, statutory, constitutional, or international – ‘scarcity combatant’ social contract; which enables or advocates on behalf of human procreation, consumption or production of resources that transgress ecological carrying capacity limits, is guilty of the ‘crime of aggression act of war’.”

Crimes of Aggression Acts of War Convictions & Sentencing:

Consumption Violation Sentences:

Individuals found negligently guilty of violating consumption social contract limits; would be required to (a) relinquish their excess consumed products; and provide community service labour; to the extent of the infraction.

Individuals found intentionally guilty of violating consumption social contract limits; shall be provided the opportunity to (a) choose their preferred method of state assisted suicide; (b) be granted the opportunity to say goodbye to loved ones and (c) be eliminated from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of state assisted suicide.

Procreation Violation Sentences:

Individuals found guilty of negligently violating procreation social contract limits; would be required to be permanently sterilized.

Individuals found guilty of intentionally violating procreation social contract limits; would be required to (a) relinquish said child for adoption – if wanted to be adopted by a family – and  be given their choice as to how they prefer to be humanely executed; (b) if no adoptive family is found; parents and child are to be given their choice as to how they prefer to be humanely executed.

EoP Axis Nation State Employees:

Every employee from the President down to the school janitor who is an employee of a federal, state, city or local government; is given one month to sign their Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration; and submit it to appointed Federal, National and LocalEcology of Peace Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration Ombudsman.

All State employees who refuse to sign Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration are retrenched; with six months salary retrenchment package.

All Government Pensions for all employees who have not yet retired; whether they sign Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration or not; are immediately cancelled. All Government Pensions for individuals who have already retired shall be notified in writing; that such pensions shall be cancelled within twelve months.

All Government employees, including current or former pension holders; who do not own any property; who sign an Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration shall be provided with an EoP allotted ecofootprint ration of nationalized property; for their use; to enable them to sustain their most basic shelter, food and water needs; and engage with neighbours into local food production cooperatives; to begin the process of rebuilding local cooperative tribal responsible freedom communities.

Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration.

A citizen’s signed Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration will declare that the particular citizen understands and legally agrees to the following:

I hereby declare that I understand Responsible Freedom to mean:

  1. Earth is not flat.
  2. Resources are finite.
  3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshootresource depletionand resource conflict.
  4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peaceinternational law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.
  5. The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits and consequently Nation States failure to (a) avoid resource depletion and sustainable protection of national renewable and non-renewable resources for other species and future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; are the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of the Masonic War is Peaceinternational law social contract’.
  6. I request – and commit to support – the President and all supporting Political Party leaders; to officially and publicly begin legal International negotiations – by adopting any of the Ecology of Peace New World Order Negotiations social contract optionsused individually or in select combination or collectively; or other more suitable options – to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; that shall (i) abolish the root ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract’; and (ii) replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that require all of the worlds citizens from all races, classes and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; and anyone convicted of breeding and/or consumption violations shall be eliminated from the planetary genepool.

I hereby declare that I understand Honourable Reason & Logic Problem Solving Communication Policy Discourse values to mean:

  1. If I am committed to honourable discourse; and I am giving someone else the benefit of the doubt that they are committed to honourable truthseeking discussion:
  2. I clarify my preferences; to enable people being communicated to, to clearly know what I want; and whether they are willing to engage me in entering into an agreement; to help me get what I want; and reciprocally whether I can help them to get what they may want.
  3. I always respond to verbal and written correspondence, with a sincere honest response. If I don’t have time to respond; I inform them by when they can expect a response.
  4. I sincerely and actively listen to the evidence from any individual, irrespective of their political ideology – i.e. right wing to left wing – religion, race or culture. Active listening means you verify that your interpretation of their statements is accurate; before concluding that you have ‘heard their argument’.
  5. I focus on simplifying the issue discussed, using as much as possible descriptive words; as opposed to abstract concepts. If or where I include reference to abstract concepts; I am  willing to define my meaning of that abstract concept within that circumstance.
  6. I evaluate their argument based upon the evidence they present, not their race, religion or political ideology; etc.
  7. If I am not convinced by the quality of their evidence on any particular issue; I am willing to agree to disagree on that particular issue, and cooperate if they are willing to engage in cooperative truthseeking to get better quality evidence; so that a  stronger beyond reasonable doubt conclusion can be drawn on the particular issue in dispute.
  8. I remain in the conversation until we find agreement; so as to support each other on other issues that we do agree upon, which are based upon more conclusive buck stops here evidence.
  9. If or where sincere conflict arises in the discussion about the issue in dispute; I am committed to remaining in the conversation and finding a way to resolve the conflict, by allowing myself, them or both of us to get over our anger; as opposed to requiring them to suppress their anger for political correct ‘lets pretend we are getting along’ reasons. Once the emotional steam has been released through the conflict resolution process; both parties will find themselves in a more calm neutral space where the truthseeking conversation can proceed.
  10. If either of us decide that we are unable to resolve the conflict between us:
  11. If none of us are employed by the State and/or legally obligated to help each other on the particular issue of preference in dispute; we honourably terminate discussions and approach others for help to get what we respectively want.
  12. If one or both of us are employed by the State and/or an organization or profession legally obligated to provide support to enable resolution of the particular requested preference; we cooperatively refer the matter to an honourable discourse truthseeking arbitrator for impartial dispute resolution.
  13. If at any point during discussion; or arbitration proceedings; their evidence proves any of my evidence for any of my ideological, racial or religious working hypothesis theories or beliefs to be inaccurate; I love reason and logic more than my ego-identity and hence I am willing to publicly change my mind, on that particular subject and amend my ideological working hypothesis or belief with the new evidence provided; and if necessary to apologize.

Naturally anyone who refuses – without reasonable justification – to engage in aforementioned honourable discourse; is not remotely interested in peace, anti-war, or non-violent root cause problem solving of socio-economic resource war conflict; and depending on the circumstances; may consciously or unconsciously be providing their informed consent justification for the issue in dispute to be resolved by means of violence. Although honourable discourse would recommend that they be consciously made aware of how their refusal to engage in honourable discourse root cause problem solving of the issue in dispute; demonstrates their lack of commitment and sincerity to non-violent root cause problem solving.

Deception Communication Crimes of Aggression:

Fully Informed Consensual Relating Violation Sentences:

Individuals found guilty of negligently violating ‘Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ as part of their inter-relating agreements; shall be required to attend and graduate from a Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ communication values class; where they would learn how to communicate their preferences and relate to others in accordance to Fully Informed Consenting Communication values; and sign a Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration to graduate.

Individuals found guilty of intentionally violating ‘Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ as part of their inter-relating agreements; shall be provided the opportunity to (a) choose their preferred method of state assisted suicide; (b) be granted the opportunity to say goodbye to their loved ones and (c) be eliminated from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of state assisted suicide.

Ecology of Peace New Economy Sustainability Definition:

A Sustainable society practices Sustainable Procreation and Sustainable Natural Resource Utilization Behaviour; i.e. all of its citizens consume and procreate below carrying capacity.  SustainableNatural Resource Utilization Behaviour behaviour involves the utilization of renewable natural resources—water, cropland, pastureland, forests, and wildlife—exclusively, which can be depleted only at levels less than or equal to the levels at which they are replenished by Nature. The utilization of non-renewable natural resources (NNR’s)—fossil fuels, metals, and minerals—at any level, is not sustainable[1].

Carrying Capacity Sustainability: I=PAT Equation:

For activities to be genuinely sustainable it must be possible for them to continue indefinitely. The impact of humanity on the environment and the demands that people place on the resources available on the planet can be summarised by what is known as the Ehrlich or IPAT equation, I=PAT. I = impact on the environment or demand for resources, P = population size, A = affluence and T = technology. The two most important conclusions deriving from this IPAT footprint[2] relationship are that: (i) the Earth can support only a limited number of people, at a certain level of affluence, in a sustainable manner; and (ii) Population and Consumption must be reduced to below carrying capacity.

Carrying Capacity aka Biocapacity Limits:

“The maximum number of individuals that can be supported sustainably by a given environment is known as its ‘carrying capacity’. Worldwide the total amount of biologically productive land and sea amounts to 12 billion global hectares (gha); or 1.8 gha each if divided by 6.7 billion each. Guerrylla Laws are drawn up in accordance with the proactive conservation policies of Bhutan[3], who set aside 40% of their biologically productive to be returned to its natural state, for other species and wildlife conservation purposes; then that means that the total amount of biologically productive carrying capacity land available to humans is 60% of 12 billion; which amounts to 7.2 billion gha total; or 60% of 1.8 gha, which is 1 gha each.  Population factor is relevant, because the more humans there are, the less biologically productive land there is for everyone else. For example:

Biocapacity limits of 6.7, 3.5, 1 Billion, 500, 250 & 100 Million:

7.2 billion global hectares of biologically productive land and water divided by (a) 6.7 billion humans, equals: 1.07 gha each; (b) 3.5 billion equals 2.05 gha each; (c) 1 billion equals 7.2 gha each; (d) 500 million equals 14.4 gha each; (e) 250 million equals 28.8 gha; (f) 100 million equals 72 gha each.

Procreation Factor:

As noted, the more people there are; the less biologically productive land there is available for everyone else. According to the research of Paul Murtaugh, the procreation factor that should be added by ecology footprint organisations to their Consumption footprint calculators, is 20 per child. [Each Child increases a parent’s cumulative consumption footprint by factor of 20[4]]

Difference between Sustainable (Leaver Eco-Innocent) v Unsustainable (Taker Scarcity Combatant):

An individuals IPAT footprint is a result of: (A) Consumption Footprint multiplied by (B) Procreation Factor (Every child increases 20 Child Factor). If their IPAT footprint is below carrying capacity limits, they are an Eco-Innocent Leaver; if their IPAT footprint is above carrying capacity limits, they are a Scarcity Combatant Taker.

Total Footprint = Consumption x Procreation Factor.

To work out your Consumption footprint; you will need to use a Consumption Footprint calculator. Current online footprint calculators: Global Footprint Network[5] (copy available at Earth Day[6]; Center for Sustainable Economy[7]; EcoCampus[8]. See more at Global Footprint’s Application Standards[9], where they detail how their calculators calculate Consumption footprints. The quiz will ask you various questions about your consumption habits, and provide you with a final consumption footprint in global hectares which is your ‘consumption footprint’. For the purposes of this calculation; avoid footprint calculator quizzes that do not provide you with your final gha consumption footprint amount, such as for example: World Wildlife Fund’s footprint calculator[10] or Stanford International Students[11] (which is excellent and has great detail; but does not provide you with a final footprint in gha terms). Multiply your consumption footprint gha amount by your Procreation Factor: the number of children you have procreated multiplied by 20. The total amount is your Total Footprint.

EoP Updates pending reinstatement of deleted EoP websites.

Pending reinstatement of EoP accounts on Weebly:

Ecology of Peace correspondence on issues not stated as directly related to hacking of Tygae and SQSwans – including regarding Student Responsible Freedom Plaintiff Declaration; and its updatedEoP Wealth Transfer Option – are temporarily updated at: EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations Comments Correspondence.

A copy of this correspondence is documented at: SQSwans PRH: EoP v WiP NWO Neg CC.

If or when the Tygae and SQSwans websites and account are reinstated: (a) EoP v WiP Negotiations shall again be updated at MILED Clerk Notice; (b) this correspondence shall be documented at: (i) EoP Applicants [PDF]: Vladimir Putin; Timothy McVeigh; (ii) EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations: Comments Correspondence [PDF]: Nigel Farage, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton.

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk
—————————————————
[1] Sustainability Defined, Chris Clugston, WakeUpAmerika
[2] EcoFootprint: The difference between the biocapacity and Ecological Footprint of a region or country. A biocapacity deficit occurs when the Footprint of a population exceeds the biocapacity of the area available to that population. If there is a regional or national biocapacity deficit, it means that the region is importing biocapacity through trade or liquidating regional ecological assets. Global biocapacity deficit cannot be compensated through trade, and is overshoot.
[3] Bhutan Proactive Conservation: Bhutan is seen as a model for proactive conservation initiatives. The Kingdom has received international acclaim for its commitment to the maintenance of its biodiversity. This is reflected in the decision to maintain at least sixty percent of the land area under forest cover, to designate more than 40% of its territory as national parks, reserves and other protected areas, and most recently to identify a further nine percent of land area as biodiversity corridors linking the protected areas. Environmental conservation has been placed at the core of the nation’s development strategy, the middle path. It is not treated as a sector but rather as a set of concerns that must be mainstreamed in Bhutan’s overall approach to development planning and to be buttressed by the force of law. – “Parks of Bhutan”. Bhutan Trust Fund for Environmental Conservation online. Bhutan Trust Fund.
[4] Paul Murtaugh (7-31-09): Family Planning: A Major Environmental Emphasis, Oregon University http://sqswans.weebly.com/child–ecofootprint-x-20.html
[5] http://footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/calculators/
[6] http://www.earthday.org/footprint-calculator
[7] http://www.myfootprint.org/
[8] http://ecocamp.us/eco-footprint-calculator
[9] http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/application_standards/
[10] http://footprint.wwf.org.uk/ Other Green Footprint calculators: http://greenschools.net/article.php?id=271
[11] http://footprint.stanford.edu/index.html

 

sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34