* EoP NWO SCO: EoP WT.
* 12 Oct: Inter-Pacific Bar Assoc: Request Japan v Satoshi Uematsu Prosecutor & Defense Counsel Contact Details to File EoP Amicus Request.
» Inter-Pacific Bar Association Officers, Inter-Pacific Bar Assoc Jurisdicational Council & Regional Coordinators, Japan Org: Academic, Ecological; Banking & Shinto, PM Shinzo Abe via Amb Hiroki: Japan Emb & Consul in SA, Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China & All China Lawyers Assoc, Accessible Japan.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub / EoP NWO SCO: EoP WT, JP v S Uematsu, EoP v WiP NWO Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:30 PM | 1:35 PM
Subject: IPBA: Request Japan v Satoshi Uematsu Prosecutor & Defense Counsel Contact Details to File EoP Amicus Request.
To: Inter-Pacific Bar Association <email@example.com>, “Pres: Huen Wong: Hong Kong: Fried Frank Harris Shriver Jacobson” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Dhinesh Bhaskaran: Kuala Lumpur: Shearn Delamore” <email@example.com>, “Denis McNamara: NZ: Lowndes” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Sec Gen: Miyuki Ishiguro: Japan: Nagashima Ohno Tsunematso” <email@example.com>, “Caroline Berube: China: HJM Asia Law” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Prog Coord: Sumeet Kachwaha: India: Kachwaha Partners” <email@example.com>, “Jose Cochingyan: Philippines: Cochingyan Peralta” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Sylvette Tankiang: Philippines: Villaraza Angangco” <email@example.com>, “Masafumi Kodama: Japan: Kitahama Partners” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Young-Jae Chang: Korea: Lee & Ko” <email@example.com>, “Anne Durez: France: Total SA” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Maxine Chiang: Taiwan: Chiang Lee” <email@example.com>, “Leonard Yeoh: Malaysia: Tay Partners” <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: “Australia: Clayton Utz: Bruce Lloyd” <email@example.com>, “Canada: Fasken Martineau: Robert Wai Quon” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “China: Jun He Law: Audrey Chen” <email@example.com>, “France: Patrick Vovan” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Germany: Gerhard Wegen” <email@example.com>, “Hong Kong: Annie Tsoi” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “India: Kochhar: Dhruv Wahi” <email@example.com>, “Indonesia: Abraham Law: David Abraham” <David@abraham-lawfirm.com>, “Japan: TMI Assoc: Ryosuke Ito” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Korea: Yulchon: Chang-Rok Woo” <email@example.com>, “Malaysia: Mohanadass: Mohan Kanagasabai” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “New Zealand: Buddle Findlay: Neil Russ” <email@example.com>, “Pakistan: Vellani: Badaruddin Vellani” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Philippines: Romulo: Perry Pe” <email@example.com>, “Singapore: Rajah Tann: Francis Xavier” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Switzerland: MME Partners: Bernhard Meyer” <email@example.com>, “China-Taiwan: Tsar & Tsai: Edgar Chen” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Thailand: Chandler & Thong: Niwes Phancharoenworag” <email@example.com>, “UK: Nabarro: Jonathan Warne” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “USA: Watt Tieder Hoffer Fitzgerald: Keith Phillips” <email@example.com>, “Europe: Smit D’Oria: Jean-Claude Beaujour” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Asia Pacific: Finlaysons: Michael Butler” <email@example.com>, “North America: KL Gates: Wilson Chu” <Wilson.Chu@klgates.com>, “Sri Lanka & Bangladesh: Varners: Nimal Weeraratne” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Middle East: Hadef Partners: Richard Briggs” <email@example.com>, “China: Beijing Gaotong: Yunchuan Jing” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Hawaii: Mark Shklov” <email@example.com>, “India: Suchitra Chitale” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Latin America: TozziniFreire: Shin Jae Kim” <email@example.com>, “Japan: Nakamoto: Hiroe Toyoshima” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Hong Kong: Christopher To” <email@example.com>, “Kyoto Univ: Center for Ecological Research: Dir Shin-ichi Nakano” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Prof Atsushi Yamauchi <email@example.com>, “Bank of Japan: Public Relations” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, BOJ Time Data <email@example.com>, Info <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Shintoism Scholars: Futahashira Shrine” <email@example.com>, International Shinto Foundation <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Guji Yukitaka Yamamoto<email@example.com>, Embassy in Pretoria Cultural Info Center <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Capetown Consul <email@example.com>, National People’s Congress of People’s Republic of China <English@npc.gov.cn>, All China Lawyers Association <firstname.lastname@example.org>
TO: Inter-Pacific Bar Association Officers
CC: Inter-Pacific Bar Assoc Jurisdicational Council & Regional Coordinators [sent separately]
CC: Japan Org: Academic, Ecological; Banking & Shinto
CC: PM Shinzo Abe via Amb Hiroki: Japan Emb & Consul in SA
CC: Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China & All China Lawyers Assoc:
IP Bar Assoc: Officers:
Inter-Pacific Bar Association (email@example.com); Pres: Huen Wong: Hong Kong: Fried Frank Harris Shriver Jacobson (firstname.lastname@example.org); Dhinesh Bhaskaran: Kuala Lumpur: Shearn Delamore (email@example.com); Denis McNamara: NZ: Lowndes (firstname.lastname@example.org); Sec Gen: Miyuki Ishiguro: Japan: Nagashima Ohno Tsunematso (email@example.com); Caroline Berube: China: HJM Asia Law (firstname.lastname@example.org); Prog Coord: Sumeet Kachwaha: India: Kachwaha Partners (email@example.com); Jose Cochingyan: Philippines: Cochingyan Peralta (firstname.lastname@example.org); Sylvette Tankiang: Philippines: Villaraza Angangco (email@example.com); Masafumi Kodama: Japan: Kitahama Partners (firstname.lastname@example.org); Young-Jae Chang: Korea: Lee & Ko (email@example.com); Anne Durez: France: Total SA (firstname.lastname@example.org); Maxine Chiang: Taiwan: Chiang Lee (email@example.com); Leonard Yeoh: Malaysia: Tay Partners (firstname.lastname@example.org);
IP Bar Assoc: Jurisdictional Council & Regional Coordinators:
Australia: Clayton Utz: Bruce Lloyd (email@example.com); Canada: Fasken Martineau: Robert Wai Quon (firstname.lastname@example.org); China: Jun He Law: Audrey Chen (email@example.com); France: Patrick Vovan (firstname.lastname@example.org); Germany: Gerhard Wegen (email@example.com); Hong Kong: Annie Tsoi (firstname.lastname@example.org); India: Kochhar: Dhruv Wahi (email@example.com); Indonesia: Abraham Law: David Abraham (David@abraham-lawfirm.com); Japan: TMI Assoc: Ryosuke Ito (firstname.lastname@example.org); Korea: Yulchon: Chang-Rok Woo (email@example.com); Malaysia: Mohanadass: Mohan Kanagasabai (firstname.lastname@example.org); New Zealand: Buddle Findlay: Neil Russ (email@example.com); Pakistan: Vellani: Badaruddin Vellani (firstname.lastname@example.org); Philippines: Romulo: Perry Pe (email@example.com); Singapore: Rajah Tann: Francis Xavier (firstname.lastname@example.org); Switzerland: MME Partners: Bernhard Meyer (email@example.com); China-Taiwan: Tsar & Tsai: Edgar Chen (firstname.lastname@example.org); Thailand: Chandler & Thong: Niwes Phancharoenworag (email@example.com); UK: Nabarro: Jonathan Warne (firstname.lastname@example.org); USA: Watt Tieder Hoffer Fitzgerald: Keith Phillips (email@example.com); Europe: Smit D’Oria: Jean-Claude Beaujour (firstname.lastname@example.org); Asia Pacific: Finlaysons: Michael Butler (email@example.com); North America: KL Gates: Wilson Chu (Wilson.Chu@klgates.com); Sri Lanka & Bangladesh: Varners: Nimal Weeraratne (firstname.lastname@example.org); Middle East: Hadef Partners: Richard Briggs (email@example.com); China: Beijing Gaotong: Yunchuan Jing (firstname.lastname@example.org); Hawaii: Mark Shklov (email@example.com); India: Suchitra Chitale (firstname.lastname@example.org); Latin America: TozziniFreire: Shin Jae Kim (email@example.com); Japan: Nakamoto: Hiroe Toyoshima (firstname.lastname@example.org); Hong Kong: Christopher To (email@example.com)
Japan Org: Academic, Ecological; Banking & Shinto:
Kyoto Univ: Center for Ecological Research: Dir Shin-ichi Nakano (firstname.lastname@example.org); Prof Atsushi Yamauchi (email@example.com); Bank of Japan: Public Relations (firstname.lastname@example.org); BOJ Time Data (email@example.com); Info (firstname.lastname@example.org); Shintoism Scholars: Futahashira Shrine (email@example.com); International Shinto Foundation (firstname.lastname@example.org); Guji Yukitaka Yamamoto (email@example.com)
PM Shinzo Abe via Amb Hiroki: Japan Emb & Consul in SA:
Embassy in Pretoria Cultural Info Center (firstname.lastname@example.org); Capetown Consul (email@example.com)
Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China & All China Lawyers Assoc:
Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China: Chief Justice Zhou Qiang via National People’s Congress of People’s Republic of China (English@npc.gov.cn); All China Lawyers Association (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Inter-Pacific Bar Association Officers et al:
IPBA: Request Japan v Satoshi Uematsu Prosecutor & Defense Counsel Contact Details to file EoP Amicus Request.
Wikipedia: Sagamihara Stabbings; Accessible Japan: On the Sagamihara Attack. Tokyo Reporter: Sagamihara stabbings: 16 non-monitored security cameras.
Please could you either (a) reply and let me know where I can get the contact details for the police, prosecutor and defence attorney in the case of Japan v Satoshi Uematsu; and/or (b) forward this correspondence to the police, prosecutor and defence attorney in Japan v Satoshi Uematsu; for them to either (i) consent to you providing me with their contact details for me to contact them directly; or (ii) for them to respond by contacting me directly.
I am writing to request the contact information for the police, prosecutor and defence attorneys in the case of Japan v Satoshi Uematsu. I would like to request their consent or feedback about filing an Ecology of Peace Amicus aka Friend of the Court legal submission to the Japan v Satoshi Uematsu court proceedings.
I imagine if Satoshi Uematsu had been aware of the work being done by the Ecology of Peace culture; it is possible he may have chosen to invest his energy’s on humane death for those he considered ‘disabled’ and ‘overpopulation’ issues of concern in a more proactive lawful manner; in accordance to Ecology of Peace culture’s suggested legal methods for enabling honourable and transparent depopulation and deindustrializaiton return to ecological carrying capacity limits.
If parties consent to its filing into the court proceedings; the Ecology of Peace Amicus shall provide all parties and the court with the Ecology of Peace culture’s legal definition of ‘disabled’ with regard to procreation, consumption and communication behaviours – as detailed in among others Breeding & Consumption Crimes of Aggression and Deception Communication Crimes of Aggression points in the EoP Wealth Transfer Options to shut down Casino Ponzi Economy submission below, excerpted from SQSwans PRH: EoP Wealth Transfer Option – and its legal submissions to various national and international courts, regarding amending the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the international law social contract.
EoP Updates pending reinstatement of deleted EoP websites.
EoP v WiP negotiations were – and if the hacked and deleted account is reinstated; prior to termination of EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations, as a result of Planetary elite’s preference for Masonic War is Peace orgy of violence; will again be – updated at: MILED Clerk Notice.
Pending reinstatement of EoP accounts on Weebly: A copy of this correspondence is documented at: (i) SQSwans PRH: EoP v WiP NWO Neg CC; (ii) EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations: Comments Correspondence [PDF]: Japan v Satoshi Uematsu.
Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk
* ~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~ *
EoP Wealth Transfer Options to shut down Casino Ponzi Economy:
EoP Axis Nationalization of Individuals Property:
All individuals owning property greater than the EoP allotted ecofootprint ration – as detailed under: Ecology of Peace New Economy Sustainability Definition paragraphs – will have their property nationalized.
An EoP allotted ecofootprint ration of nationalized property shall be provided to any citizen who has no property; who has signed a Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration; for their use; to enable them to sustain their most basic shelter, food and water needs; and engage with neighbours into local food production cooperatives; to begin the process of rebuilding local cooperative tribal responsible freedom communities.
EoP Axis Nationalization of Banks & Corporations:
All Banks from Bank of International Settlements; Inter-American Development Bank; APRACA: Asia-Pacific Rural to the Agriculture Credit Association; to traded and privately owned corporations shall be nationalized. The Derivatives Market will go through bankruptcy proceedings and both the Derivatives Market and Stock Exchanges will be shut down.
The ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace social contract shall be removed and replaced with Ecology of Peace clauses that restrict all the worlds citizens of all races, religions and classes to procreating and consuming below ecological carrying capacity limits; relating with others in accordance to fully informed consenting agreements; and violaters shall be eliminated from the planetary genepool. For more info on transforming the planetary economy to a sustainable economy: see: Community Solution: Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil; Doug Tompkins: The Next Economy: Transitions from Globalization to Eco-Localization.
The EoP Economy shall be based upon already mined gold and ultimately a resource mix based currency standard; where all lending / borrowing and/or bartering is to be limited to consumption and production of non-renewable and renewable natural resources below Ecological Carrying Capacity limits.
Banks and/or Corporations may avoid coercive nationalization by voluntarily choosing to engage in the conversion of their corporations to EoP cooperative corporations; by giving employees the opportunity to vote whether they wish to (a) remain with the corporation and convert their former corporation to be managed in accordance to cooperative ownership principles and agree to sign anEcology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration; (b) leave the corporation in accordance with with six months salary retrenchment package.
All nationalized corporations shall undergo the same employee vote process. Only individuals who have signed Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declarationmay be considered for Cooperative Management positions.
All Corporate Pensions for all employees who have not yet retired; whether they sign Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration, vote to remain with the corporation or be retrenched; are immediately cancelled. All Corporate Pensions for individuals who have already retired shall be notified that such pensions shall be cancelled within twelve months.
All corporate employees, including current or former pension holders; who do not own any property; who sign an Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declarationshall be provided with an EoP allotted ecofootprint ration of nationalized property; for their use; to enable them to sustain their most basic shelter, food and water needs; and engage with neighbours into local food production cooperatives; to begin the process of rebuilding local cooperative tribal responsible freedom communities.
Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Energy Facilities:
All IAEA: International Atomic Energy Agency member states are to immediately draw up a report detailing how they commit to the decommission of all their Nuclear Weapons and Energy facilities; within five years.
World Coal Association: All member corporations are to immediately draw up a report detailing how they intend to support the orderly termination and closure of all coal mining and energy production with a Production Footprint above ecological renewable/non renewable carrying capacity limits; i.e. all future coal exploitation and production of non-renewable and renewable natural resources must be limited to below Ecological Carrying Capacity limits.
Breeding & Consumption Crimes of Aggression:
“Any individual who is found guilty of advocating on behalf of, legislating, enforcing, or obeying any – cultural, religious, common, statutory, constitutional, or international – ‘scarcity combatant’ social contract; which enables or advocates on behalf of human procreation, consumption or production of resources that transgress ecological carrying capacity limits, is guilty of the ‘crime of aggression act of war’.”
Crimes of Aggression Acts of War Convictions & Sentencing:
Consumption Violation Sentences:
Individuals found negligently guilty of violating consumption social contract limits; would be required to (a) relinquish their excess consumed products; and provide community service labour; to the extent of the infraction.
Individuals found intentionally guilty of violating consumption social contract limits; shall be provided the opportunity to (a) choose their preferred method of state assisted suicide; (b) be granted the opportunity to say goodbye to loved ones and (c) be eliminated from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of state assisted suicide.
Procreation Violation Sentences:
Individuals found guilty of negligently violating procreation social contract limits; would be required to be permanently sterilized.
Individuals found guilty of intentionally violating procreation social contract limits; would be required to (a) relinquish said child for adoption – if wanted to be adopted by a family – and be given their choice as to how they prefer to be humanely executed; (b) if no adoptive family is found; parents and child are to be given their choice as to how they prefer to be humanely executed.
EoP Axis Nation State Employees:
Every employee from the President down to the school janitor who is an employee of a federal, state, city or local government; is given one month to sign their Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration; and submit it to appointed Federal, National and LocalEcology of Peace Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration Ombudsman.
All State employees who refuse to sign Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration are retrenched; with six months salary retrenchment package.
All Government Pensions for all employees who have not yet retired; whether they sign Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration or not; are immediately cancelled. All Government Pensions for individuals who have already retired shall be notified in writing; that such pensions shall be cancelled within twelve months.
All Government employees, including current or former pension holders; who do not own any property; who sign an Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration shall be provided with an EoP allotted ecofootprint ration of nationalized property; for their use; to enable them to sustain their most basic shelter, food and water needs; and engage with neighbours into local food production cooperatives; to begin the process of rebuilding local cooperative tribal responsible freedom communities.
Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration.
A citizen’s signed Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration will declare that the particular citizen understands and legally agrees to the following:
I hereby declare that I understand Responsible Freedom to mean:
- Earth is not flat.
- Resources are finite.
- When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletionand resource conflict.
- If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peaceinternational law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.
- The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits and consequently Nation States failure to (a) avoid resource depletion and sustainable protection of national renewable and non-renewable resources for other species and future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; are the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of the Masonic War is Peaceinternational law social contract’.
- I request – and commit to support – the President and all supporting Political Party leaders; to officially and publicly begin legal International negotiations – by adopting any of the Ecology of Peace New World Order Negotiations social contract optionsused individually or in select combination or collectively; or other more suitable options – to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; that shall (i) abolish the root ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract’; and (ii) replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that require all of the worlds citizens from all races, classes and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; and anyone convicted of breeding and/or consumption violations shall be eliminated from the planetary genepool.
I hereby declare that I understand Honourable Reason & Logic Problem Solving Communication Policy Discourse values to mean:
- If I am committed to honourable discourse; and I am giving someone else the benefit of the doubt that they are committed to honourable truthseeking discussion:
- I clarify my preferences; to enable people being communicated to, to clearly know what I want; and whether they are willing to engage me in entering into an agreement; to help me get what I want; and reciprocally whether I can help them to get what they may want.
- I always respond to verbal and written correspondence, with a sincere honest response. If I don’t have time to respond; I inform them by when they can expect a response.
- I sincerely and actively listen to the evidence from any individual, irrespective of their political ideology – i.e. right wing to left wing – religion, race or culture. Active listening means you verify that your interpretation of their statements is accurate; before concluding that you have ‘heard their argument’.
- I focus on simplifying the issue discussed, using as much as possible descriptive words; as opposed to abstract concepts. If or where I include reference to abstract concepts; I am willing to define my meaning of that abstract concept within that circumstance.
- I evaluate their argument based upon the evidence they present, not their race, religion or political ideology; etc.
- If I am not convinced by the quality of their evidence on any particular issue; I am willing to agree to disagree on that particular issue, and cooperate if they are willing to engage in cooperative truthseeking to get better quality evidence; so that a stronger beyond reasonable doubt conclusion can be drawn on the particular issue in dispute.
- I remain in the conversation until we find agreement; so as to support each other on other issues that we do agree upon, which are based upon more conclusive buck stops here evidence.
- If or where sincere conflict arises in the discussion about the issue in dispute; I am committed to remaining in the conversation and finding a way to resolve the conflict, by allowing myself, them or both of us to get over our anger; as opposed to requiring them to suppress their anger for political correct ‘lets pretend we are getting along’ reasons. Once the emotional steam has been released through the conflict resolution process; both parties will find themselves in a more calm neutral space where the truthseeking conversation can proceed.
- If either of us decide that we are unable to resolve the conflict between us:
- If none of us are employed by the State and/or legally obligated to help each other on the particular issue of preference in dispute; we honourably terminate discussions and approach others for help to get what we respectively want.
- If one or both of us are employed by the State and/or an organization or profession legally obligated to provide support to enable resolution of the particular requested preference; we cooperatively refer the matter to an honourable discourse truthseeking arbitrator for impartial dispute resolution.
- If at any point during discussion; or arbitration proceedings; their evidence proves any of my evidence for any of my ideological, racial or religious working hypothesis theories or beliefs to be inaccurate; I love reason and logic more than my ego-identity and hence I am willing to publicly change my mind, on that particular subject and amend my ideological working hypothesis or belief with the new evidence provided; and if necessary to apologize.
Honourable Discourse principles are excerpted from: EoP RH culture info.
Naturally anyone who refuses – without reasonable justification – to engage in aforementioned honourable discourse; is not remotely interested in peace, anti-war, or non-violent root cause problem solving of socio-economic resource war conflict; and depending on the circumstances; may consciously or unconsciously be providing their informed consent justification for the issue in dispute to be resolved by means of violence. Although honourable discourse would recommend that they be consciously made aware of how their refusal to engage in honourable discourse root cause problem solving of the issue in dispute; demonstrates their lack of commitment and sincerity to non-violent root cause problem solving.
Deception Communication Crimes of Aggression:
Fully Informed Consensual Relating Violation Sentences:
Individuals found guilty of negligently violating ‘Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ as part of their inter-relating agreements; shall be required to attend and graduate from a Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ communication values class; where they would learn how to communicate their preferences and relate to others in accordance to Fully Informed Consenting Communication values; and sign a Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration to graduate.
Individuals found guilty of intentionally violating ‘Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ as part of their inter-relating agreements; shall be provided the opportunity to (a) choose their preferred method of state assisted suicide; (b) be granted the opportunity to say goodbye to their loved ones and (c) be eliminated from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of state assisted suicide.
Ecology of Peace New Economy Sustainability Definition:
A Sustainable society practices Sustainable Procreation and Sustainable Natural Resource Utilization Behaviour; i.e. all of its citizens consume and procreate below carrying capacity. SustainableNatural Resource Utilization Behaviour behaviour involves the utilization of renewable natural resources—water, cropland, pastureland, forests, and wildlife—exclusively, which can be depleted only at levels less than or equal to the levels at which they are replenished by Nature. The utilization of non-renewable natural resources (NNR’s)—fossil fuels, metals, and minerals—at any level, is not sustainable.
Carrying Capacity Sustainability: I=PAT Equation:
For activities to be genuinely sustainable it must be possible for them to continue indefinitely. The impact of humanity on the environment and the demands that people place on the resources available on the planet can be summarised by what is known as the Ehrlich or IPAT equation, I=PAT. I = impact on the environment or demand for resources, P = population size, A = affluence and T = technology. The two most important conclusions deriving from this IPAT footprint relationship are that: (i) the Earth can support only a limited number of people, at a certain level of affluence, in a sustainable manner; and (ii) Population and Consumption must be reduced to below carrying capacity.
Carrying Capacity aka Biocapacity Limits:
“The maximum number of individuals that can be supported sustainably by a given environment is known as its ‘carrying capacity’. Worldwide the total amount of biologically productive land and sea amounts to 12 billion global hectares (gha); or 1.8 gha each if divided by 6.7 billion each. Guerrylla Laws are drawn up in accordance with the proactive conservation policies of Bhutan, who set aside 40% of their biologically productive to be returned to its natural state, for other species and wildlife conservation purposes; then that means that the total amount of biologically productive carrying capacity land available to humans is 60% of 12 billion; which amounts to 7.2 billion gha total; or 60% of 1.8 gha, which is 1 gha each. Population factor is relevant, because the more humans there are, the less biologically productive land there is for everyone else. For example:
Biocapacity limits of 6.7, 3.5, 1 Billion, 500, 250 & 100 Million:
7.2 billion global hectares of biologically productive land and water divided by (a) 6.7 billion humans, equals: 1.07 gha each; (b) 3.5 billion equals 2.05 gha each; (c) 1 billion equals 7.2 gha each; (d) 500 million equals 14.4 gha each; (e) 250 million equals 28.8 gha; (f) 100 million equals 72 gha each.
As noted, the more people there are; the less biologically productive land there is available for everyone else. According to the research of Paul Murtaugh, the procreation factor that should be added by ecology footprint organisations to their Consumption footprint calculators, is 20 per child. [Each Child increases a parent’s cumulative consumption footprint by factor of 20]
Difference between Sustainable (Leaver Eco-Innocent) v Unsustainable (Taker Scarcity Combatant):
An individuals IPAT footprint is a result of: (A) Consumption Footprint multiplied by (B) Procreation Factor (Every child increases 20 Child Factor). If their IPAT footprint is below carrying capacity limits, they are an Eco-Innocent Leaver; if their IPAT footprint is above carrying capacity limits, they are a Scarcity Combatant Taker.
Total Footprint = Consumption x Procreation Factor.
To work out your Consumption footprint; you will need to use a Consumption Footprint calculator. Current online footprint calculators: Global Footprint Network (copy available at Earth Day; Center for Sustainable Economy; EcoCampus. See more at Global Footprint’s Application Standards, where they detail how their calculators calculate Consumption footprints. The quiz will ask you various questions about your consumption habits, and provide you with a final consumption footprint in global hectares which is your ‘consumption footprint’. For the purposes of this calculation; avoid footprint calculator quizzes that do not provide you with your final gha consumption footprint amount, such as for example: World Wildlife Fund’s footprint calculator or Stanford International Students (which is excellent and has great detail; but does not provide you with a final footprint in gha terms). Multiply your consumption footprint gha amount by your Procreation Factor: the number of children you have procreated multiplied by 20. The total amount is your Total Footprint.
 Sustainability Defined, Chris Clugston, WakeUpAmerika
 EcoFootprint: The difference between the biocapacity and Ecological Footprint of a region or country. A biocapacity deficit occurs when the Footprint of a population exceeds the biocapacity of the area available to that population. If there is a regional or national biocapacity deficit, it means that the region is importing biocapacity through trade or liquidating regional ecological assets. Global biocapacity deficit cannot be compensated through trade, and is overshoot.
 Bhutan Proactive Conservation: Bhutan is seen as a model for proactive conservation initiatives. The Kingdom has received international acclaim for its commitment to the maintenance of its biodiversity. This is reflected in the decision to maintain at least sixty percent of the land area under forest cover, to designate more than 40% of its territory as national parks, reserves and other protected areas, and most recently to identify a further nine percent of land area as biodiversity corridors linking the protected areas. Environmental conservation has been placed at the core of the nation’s development strategy, the middle path. It is not treated as a sector but rather as a set of concerns that must be mainstreamed in Bhutan’s overall approach to development planning and to be buttressed by the force of law. – “Parks of Bhutan”. Bhutan Trust Fund for Environmental Conservation online. Bhutan Trust Fund.
 Paul Murtaugh (7-31-09): Family Planning: A Major Environmental Emphasis, Oregon University http://sqswans.weebly.com/child–ecofootprint-x-20.html
 http://footprint.wwf.org.uk/ Other Green Footprint calculators: http://greenschools.net/article.php?id=271