EoP UN Resolution

Draft of EoP UN Resolution legislation to implement Ecology of Peace scientific and cultural law: i.e. draft of EoP UN Resolution.

.

The EoP UN Resolution [PDF] and Amendment to Crime of Aggression Definition of Rome Statute of Intnl Criminal Court [PDF] are being submitted to EoP Axis [eop-axis.tygae.org.za] Nations Presidents via their South African Ambassadors, for their consent, editing and/or objections, to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law; in EoP TRC legal negotiations filed in George High Court: Case 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu [lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za] on 16 May 2019 [16 May: Court Filings with George High Court Registrar & SA Sheriff].

.

The EoP – Bo Gritz v Donald Trump – submission to President Trump recommends the global implementation of Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law: 24 Feb: Bo Gritz: EoP Secretary of Defence Draft Offer to President Trump: DRAFT: Request Consent / Edits / Objections: UN Security Council & General Assembly Binding Resolution to Implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law [PDF]; Suggested Amended Definition of Rome Statute of Intnl Criminal Court Definition of Crime of Aggression [PDF].

.

DRAFT – 24 Feb 2019: Draft: Req for Info: UN SC-GA Binding EoP SciCult intnl-law vote

IN THE UNITED STATES ARMY FIRST JUDICIAL COURT,
FORT MEADE, MARYLAND

Case _______________

James Gordon ‘Bo’ Gritz

Plaintiff

– versus –

Donald James Trump

Accused

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
24 February 2019
Request Consent / Edits / Objections: DRAFT UN Security Council & General Assembly Binding Resolution to Implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law.

.

Summary

[1] EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] – based on EoP Footprint [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za] – is the Ecology of Peace culture’s answer to the EoP John Brown – how to get along without deceiving, overbreeding and overconsuming – Question: What is a Sustainable Procreation and Consumption footprint? EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] is the recommended objective reality socio-legal cultural frame of orientation process for implementing EoP SciCult law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law.

Resolution for a UN Security Council and General Assembly Vote:

[2] A Binding Recorded Vote to confirm Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law as Supreme Global Social Contract International law.

[3] Recognizing Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] principles: [A] Earth is round, not flat. [B] Resources are finite. [C] When beings who call themselves humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict. [D] Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of national and international laws allowing overpopulation & overconsumption collision with declining resources include: climate change, poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, debt based fiat currency, usury, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc [E] The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits are the Masonic War is Peace clauses of international law allowing individuals who call themselves humans to breed and consume above carrying capacity limits [F] that if individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with Ecology of Peace – EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] – clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.

[4] Cooperatively Authorizing Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as supreme global social contract international law; to enable Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End Abel and Kane Cold War [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za]; to [A] enable responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation [eop-v-wip-deindpopn.tygae.org.za], prisoner release [prisoner-pardon.tygae.org.za], land reform [eop-landreform.tygae.org.za] and denuclearization [eop-denuke-defn.tygae.org.za] – shut down of the WiP Ponzi Swamp economy [eop-sdwipecon.tygae.org.za]; [B] require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed [one-child-law.tygae.org.za] and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; [C] nationalize all property and provide all responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath citizens: (i) with cultural law self rule [cult-law-self-rule.tygae.org.za] for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] land reform [eop-landreform.tygae.org.za] to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

[5] Confirming that Ecology of Peace [A] Scientific law — aka Eco Footprint — refers to: [a] Procreation below carrying capacity limits and [b] Consumption below carrying capacity limits; and [B] Cultural Law refers to Fully Informed Consenting Agreements.

[6] Further confirming that Eco Footprint is measured as follows: an individual’s Eco-Innocent and/or Ego-Combatant Footprint refers to their [A] Consumption Footprint. Consumption/Carbon Footprints are measured in accordance with the Ehrlich or I=PAT Equation: I = impact on the environment or demand for resources, P = population size, A = affluence and T = technology; multiplied by their [B] Procreation Factor: Every child increases a parents consumption footprint by a factor of twenty.

[7] Authorizing the Ecology of Peace definition of a procreation, consumption and/or deception crime of aggression act of war as international – Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Article 5.1.(d) crime of aggression – law:

[7.1] Any individual who is found guilty of consciously or unconsciously advocating on behalf of, legislating, enforcing, or obeying any – cultural, religious, common, statutory, constitutional, or international – clause of national or international law enabling or advocating on behalf of human procreation, consumption or production of resources above ecological carrying capacity limits, is guilty of the ‘crime of aggression act of war’.

[7.2] Individuals convicted of a breeding, consumption or deception crime of aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za] shall be sentenced as follows: (a) negligent: sent to responsible freedom ego and/or eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] classes; (b) intentional: death penalty: they shall be given the opportunity to remove their genes from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of assisted suicide, within two weeks of sentencing and/or by a particular date as decided by the sentencing judge; and if not done by such date, will be humanely and orderly assassinated by law enforcement appointed assassination squad officials.

[8] Where the International Criminal Court shall exercise jurisdiction:

[8.1] if or where there is probable cause evidence indicating individuals in a nation’s political, religious, corporate or media leadership to be guilty of crimes of aggression acts of war; and the nation’s prosecutors and/or police are failing to investigate and/or prosecute such individuals for crimes of aggression acts of war.

[8.2] If or where the Intnl Criminal Court has issued such an indictment; and the accused against whom such indictment has been issued, refuses to turn themselves in to the Prosecutor to answer questions; and/or to appear before the court on court appearance dates; or to provide reasons for such refusal; the ICC court may issue an AWOL crime of aggression act of war conviction and sentence; authorizing such individuals summary assassination removal from the planetary genepool.

 

Signed at ____________________ on this _______ day of ________________________.

 

_______________________________________
Applicant / Claimant:
James Gordon ‘Bo’ Gritz, Pro Se

.

DRAFT – 24 Feb 2019: Draft: Req for Info: Suggested Amended Definition of Rome Statute of Intnl Criminal Court Definition of Crime of Aggression

IN THE UNITED STATES ARMY FIRST JUDICIAL COURT,
FORT MEADE, MARYLAND

Case _______________

James Gordon ‘Bo’ Gritz

Plaintiff

– versus –

Donald James Trump

Accused

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
24 February 2019

Request Consent / Edits / Objections: DRAFT Suggested Amended Definition of Rome Statute of Intnl Criminal Court Definition of Crime of Aggression.

.

Summary

[1] EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] – based on EoP Footprint [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za] – is the Ecology of Peace culture’s answer to the EoP John Brown – how to get along without deceiving, overbreeding and overconsuming – Question: What is a Sustainable Procreation and Consumption footprint? EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] is the recommended objective reality socio-legal cultural frame of orientation process for implementing EoP SciCult law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law.

[2] As per the Resolution for the UN Security Council and General Assembly for a Binding Recorded Vote to confirm Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law as Supreme Global Social Contract International law, notice to:

[3] Authorize the Ecology of Peace definition of a procreation, consumption and/or deception crime of aggression act of war as international – Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Article 5.1.(d) crime of aggression – law:

[3.1] Any individual who is found guilty of consciously or unconsciously advocating on behalf of, legislating, enforcing, or obeying any – cultural, religious, common, statutory, constitutional, or international – clause of national or international law enabling or advocating on behalf of human procreation, consumption or production of resources above ecological carrying capacity limits, is guilty of the ‘crime of aggression act of war’.

[3.2] Individuals convicted of a breeding, consumption or deception crime of aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za] shall be sentenced as follows: (a) negligent: sent to responsible freedom ego and/or eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] classes; (b) intentional: death penalty: they shall be given the opportunity to remove their genes from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of assisted suicide, within two weeks of sentencing and/or by a particular date as decided by the sentencing judge; and if not done by such date, will be humanely and orderly assassinated by law enforcement appointed assassination squad officials.

[4] Where the International Criminal Court shall exercise jurisdiction:

[4.1] if or where there is probable cause evidence indicating individuals in a nation’s political, religious, corporate or media leadership to be guilty of crimes of aggression acts of war; and the nation’s prosecutors and/or police are failing to investigate and/or prosecute such individuals for crimes of aggression acts of war.

[4.2] If or where the Intnl Criminal Court has issued such an indictment; and the accused against whom such indictment has been issued, refuses to turn themselves in to the Prosecutor to answer questions; and/or to appear before the court on court appearance dates; or to provide reasons for such refusal; the ICC court may issue an AWOL crime of aggression act of war conviction and sentence; authorizing such individuals summary assassination removal from the planetary genepool.

 

Signed at ____________________ on this _______ day of ________________________.

 

_______________________________________
Applicant / Claimant:
James Gordon ‘Bo’ Gritz, Pro Se

.

Correspondence

EoP Leg Sub EoP UN Resolution and Bo Gritz v Donald Trump correspondence.

.