Summary of EoP Applicants suggested Ecology of Peace scientific and cultural law: suggested definition for conviction and sentencing of crimes of aggression accused ; for Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Legal Certainty Enquiry Negotiations to (i) one or more Nation’s Constitutional Court/s, and subsequently to all UN General Assembly Nations at the International Court of Justice; to (a) confirm Ecology of Peace scientific and cultural law, as international law. Citizens who wish to support their military, racial, political, religious, business etc leaders to begin EoP Truth and Reconciliation Legal Certainty Enquiry official public negotiations in their Nation, can show their support by signing their Responsible Freedom Oaths.
Subsequent to Implementation of EoP Intnl Law:
Subsequent to the International Court of Justice EoP Legal Certainty confirmation of EoP RH FREoP Scientific and Cultural Law; such Ecology of Peace international law social contract shall (a) require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalize all property and provide all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future; EoP Scientific and Cultural National and International Law Crimes of Aggression shall be defined [unless updated enabling greater clarity], convicted and sentenced as follows:
Breeding, Consumption & Deception Crimes of Aggression:
Breeding & Consumption Crimes of Aggression:
“Any individual who is found guilty of advocating on behalf of, legislating, enforcing, or obeying any – cultural, religious, common, statutory, constitutional, or international – ‘scarcity combatant’ social contract; which enables or advocates on behalf of human procreation, consumption or production of resources that transgress ecological carrying capacity limits, is guilty of the ‘crime of aggression act of war’.”
Crimes of Aggression Acts of War Convictions & Sentencing:
Consumption Violation Sentences:
Individuals found negligently guilty of violating consumption social contract limits; would be required to (a) relinquish their excess consumed products; and provide community service labour; to the extent of the infraction.
Individuals found intentionally guilty of violating consumption social contract limits; shall be provided the opportunity to (a) choose their preferred method of state assisted suicide; (b) be granted the opportunity to say goodbye to loved ones and (c) be eliminated from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of state assisted suicide.
Procreation Violation Sentences:
Individuals found guilty of negligently violating procreation social contract limits; would be required to be permanently sterilized.
Individuals found guilty of intentionally violating procreation social contract limits; would be required to (a) relinquish said child for adoption – if wanted to be adopted by a family – and be given their choice as to how they prefer to be humanely executed; (b) if no adoptive family is found; parents and child are to be given their choice as to how they prefer to be humanely executed.
Deception Communication Crimes of Aggression:
Fully Informed Consensual Relating Violation Sentences:
Individuals found guilty of negligently violating ‘Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ [aka ego-literacy] as part of their inter-relating agreements; shall be required to attend and graduate from a Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ communication values [aka ego-literacy] class; where they would learn how to communicate their preferences and relate to others in accordance to Fully Informed Consenting Communication values [akaego-literacy]; and sign a Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration to graduate.
Individuals found guilty of intentionally violating ‘Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ as part of their inter-relating agreements; shall be provided the opportunity to (a) choose their preferred method of state assisted suicide; (b) be granted the opportunity to say goodbye to their loved ones and (c) be eliminated from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of state assisted suicide.
– EoP Scientific and Cultural Law.
EoP Eco-Innocent & Scarcity Combatant Definitions Submitted to Courts
The aforementioned Ecology of Peace legal definitions of an eco-innocent and scarcity combatant, have been included in most EoP Legal Submissions to International and National Courts, etc. Official State – Judicial Court Ruling, Executive and/or Legislative Officials – responses to the EoP Legal Submissions submitted to them, can be found at: Official State Responses.
Last Updated: 13 July 2017.