Ego & Ecological Literacy

* Eco Literacy
* Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality
* Ego Literate Honourable Discourse
* What Does EoP MILED Clerk Want?
* What do EoP Applicants want?


Eco Literacy

Put simply: Ecological Illiteracy can be summarized as an individuals intellectual failure to recognize and/or egological illiterate inability to cognitively confront one or more Ecology of Peace Factual Reality principles.

Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality:

Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr] and EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw] are EoP culture’s functional group shared system of thought and action frame of orientation and object of inter-species relating devotion interpretation of reality for individuals whose object of devotion/values include: (i) honest – race, religious, gender and cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecological carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual social contract reality; and (iii) non-violent cooperative root cause problem solving.

* Objective Factual Reality:
[1] Earth is not flat.
[2] Resources are finite.
[3] When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.
[4] Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: climate change, mass migration, poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
[5] The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Babylon Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.

* Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior: Interpretative Reality:
[6] If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy [ego-eco-literacy] – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate [eop-cooperator] to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 May: LJ v LS Court Filing: NoM Afd & EoP UN Res [PDF] EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [PDF]; EoP Footprint [PDF]; EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [PDF]

Egological Literacy can be practiced by adopting an honourable discourse communication policy; based upon honesty and evidence; not only under oath in a court of law; but all hours of every day; with everyone; whether they are perceived as friends or enemies.


Ego Literate Honourable Discourse:

If you are committed to honourable discourse; and you are still giving an individual you are relating to the the benefit of the doubt that they are committed to honourable truthseeking discussion:

Clarify your preferences; to enable people being communicated to, to clearly know what you want; and whether they are willing to engage you in entering into an agreement; to help you get what you want; and reciprocally whether you can help them to get what they may want.

Always respond to verbal and written correspondence: from honourable communicators, with a sincere honest response. If you don’t have time to respond; inform them by when they can expect a response.

You sincerely and actively listen to the evidence from any individual, irrespective of their political ideology (right wing to left wing), religion, race or culture. Active listening means you verify that your interpretation of their statements is accurate [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle]; before concluding that you have ‘heard their argument’.

You focus on simplifying the issue discussed, using as much as possible descriptive words; as opposed to abstract concepts [Guide to Grammar: Abstract, Concrete, General and Specific Terms: SQ Copy]. If or where you do use abstract concepts; you are willing to define your meaning of that abstract concept within that circumstance.

You evaluate their argument based upon the evidence they present, not their race, religion or political ideology; etc.

If you are not convinced by the quality of their evidence on any particular issue; you are willing to agree to disagree on that particular issue, and if they are wiling to engage in cooperative truthseeking to get better evidence so that you are both able to get more quality evidence; so that a stronger beyond reasonable doubt conclusion can be drawn on the particular issue in dispute.

You remain in the conversation until you find agreement; and support each other on other issues that you do agree upon; based upon more conclusive buck stops here evidence.

If conflict sincerely arises in the discussion about the issue, you are committed to remaining in the conversation and finding a way to resolve the conflict, by allowing yourselves to get over your anger; as opposed to requiring yourself or others to suppress their anger for political correct ‘lets pretend we are getting along’ reasons.

If or where sincere conflict arises: if sincere about resolving the disagreement; engage each other to find a fair ‘buck stops here’ arbitrator; whose arbitration values are based upon the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, based upon the evidence, the whole evidence and nothing but the evidence. Once the emotional steam has been released through the conflict resolution process; both parties will find themselves in a more calm neutral space where the truthseeking conversation can proceed.

If at any point during discussion; or arbitration proceedings; their evidence proves any of your evidence for any of your ideological, racial or religious working hypothesis theories or beliefs to be inaccurate; you love reason and logic more than your ego-identity and hence you are willing to publicly change your mind, on that particular subject and amend your ideological working hypothesis or belief with the new evidence provided; and if necessary to apologize.

Excerpts from EoP RH Culture Info.

Social worker Brene Brown’s ‘Anatomy of Trust’ has many similarities to EoP Ego literacy communication policy; although – presumably for the same lack of character – deception of self and others – reasons as Lauren Southern in her documentary Farmlands – she consciously or unconsciously excludes EoP RH FR [] as the clear and simple metric Ego/Eco Literate path to building trust between individuals of different races, religions, classes, genders, ages, abilities and physical appearance.


What Do EoP MILED Clerk & EoP Applicants Want?

EoP Applicants [] know what EoP MILED Clerk wants; an overview of which can be found at McVeigh 2020 []. In exchange for help to get what EoP MILED Clerk wants; she does what she can, to help EoP Applicants get what they want.

According to EoP MILED Clerk’s interpretations; subject to EoP RH IQO [] caveat: EoP Applicants, on behalf of themselves and various individuals in Military Intelligence Agencies, want to know what level of buck stops here backup support they can count on, to (a) authorize EoP UN Resolution [] to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [] as international law; if possible; if not (b) authorize Lara and Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide logistics.

……. Respondents – on behalf of the organization or Head of State they represent – Consent / Edit / Objection Response to:

[A] Authorize EoP PoW TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War Negotiations:
Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End Abel and Kane Cold War [eoptrc-akcoldwar] negotiations to implement [eop-nwo-sco] EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] as international law; by process of EoP UN Resolution; to [A] enable responsible freedom [responsible-freedom orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation [eop-v-wip-deindpopn], prisoner release [prisoner-pardon ], land reform [eop-landreform ] and denuclearization [eop-denuke-defn] – shut down of the WiP Ponzi Swamp economy [eop-sdwipecon ]; [B] require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed [one-child-law ] and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint ]; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool [crimes-of-aggression ]; [C] nationalize all property and provide all responsible freedom [responsible-freedom ] oath citizens: (i) with cultural law self rule [cult-law-self-rule ] for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration [property-ration ]  land reform [eop-landreform ] to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

[B] If EoP TRC: Authorize EoP – Sustainable Security / Climate Change & Ecological Overshoot Emergency – UN Resolution:
Ecology of Peace recommended: [A] UN Security Council and General Assembly Resolution to Implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law; [B] Suggested Amendment to Crime of Aggression Definition of Rome Statute of International Criminal Court.

[C] If No EoP TRC: Authorize US v McVeigh Siberia PoW Suicide:
Logistics: (a) Respondent Lapenn on behalf of Respondent NSA: Gen Paul Nakasone and/or Timothy McVeigh’s NSA superior; authorizing the release of Timothy McVeigh to travel to South Africa and to Russia with applicant for their joint assisted suicide in Siberia; (b) Respondent Lapenn and Respondent Petrakov on behalf of Respondent NSA Dir Gen Paul Nakasone and Respondent FSB Dir Gen Alexander Bortnikov negotiating the authorized release of Timothy McVeigh to travel to South Africa and to Russia with applicant for their joint assisted suicide in Siberia; (c) Respondent Sisulu authorizing a visa for Timothy McVeigh to travel to Russia via South Africa; (d) Respondent Petrakov issuing a visa for Applicant and Timothy McVeigh to travel to Russia for their assisted suicide departure in unmarked graves in the Siberian wilderness.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 May: LJ v LS Court Filing: NoM, Afd & EoP UN Res [PDF].


EoP MILED Clerk []
Page Setup: 01 Dec 2017 []
Last Updated: 21 Oct 2018 []; 01 Jan 2019.

20 Nov 2019: transferred  [18 Nov: EoP MILED Clerk subdomain transparency notice.]
Page Setup: 20 Nov 2019 []; Last Updated: 25 Jan 2020; 16 Oct 2020.